I can't believe Obama's tax plan on the rich is to cripple how they can help those who are less fortunate (charities)...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/27/charity-tax-challenged-by-political-friends/

Am I reading into the sleuth of articles about this wrongly? It seems hurting those who are the least fortunate doesn't bother those who are moderately unfortunate (that's us- the "mob," the "general population"). Obama seems to figure that making the general population excited by not doing anything for them (by not increasing or decreasing their taxes), he can swing the "little" bad things that effects the "little guys" surviving on goodhearted charity and meanwhile the "mob" will just sit back and watch because Obama's proven he's on their side. That "side" mentality is just the type of thing that keeps Americans separated within themselves.

Have you ever heard of divide and conquer? Well if you've noticed, since you've been born politicians always say they're not going to increase taxes- they usually do and they take turns. Republicans will tax the less fortunate, then democrats tax the most fortunate. Neither side lower taxes. They just take turns increasing the taxes of ALL people and keeping them on their "sides" so they're fighting amongst themselves rather than fighting for the politicians to do what they really want.

Are we going to sit here and let Obama tax "the other side?" If we let this happen, the chain will continue. Eventually Obama will be out of office from either two full terms or an outvote, then it will likely be the republicans "turn" to come in and vote for higher taxes on the less fortunate. We've got to stop them somewhere. We've got to make them stop taking turns screwing us. They think we're stupid so they need to do everything for us - Apparently, choosing what non-profit missions are important to the people, by limiting the amount of resourced going to the charities.

We rely so heavily on the governments actions which are paid by our taxes... To decrease taxes by any amount for any person is risky, but I think that we can figure out what we need to do for the most part.

The banking system is corrupt. Here's how it's corrupt...
All you need is:
1. A little money
2. Someone who wants money
3. Someone who pays back
4. A "henchman" to punish those who don't pay back

(Ironically, more tax is paid to keep those people in jail). Would you let your neighbor borrow money, then put your neighbor in jail and pay to keep him there if he doesn't pay?

The entire banking system is based on "greed," a vice with very little understanding by today's society. Greed makes the whole system corrupt. Greed is based on fear, they need more money because they fear they will be unhappy without it.

So how do we stop it? If you want to stop greed, you have to root out its root problem- fear. People must be shown the truth and there will be no convincing necessary - That they can have happiness without a cent of money. For those who have been so greedy, how to do they become charitable without being resented for their past mistakes? Forgiveness.

Without forgiveness, none of this is remotely possible. How many criminals of the soul do you think would confess the things they realize are wrong if punishment from outsiders awaits their confession? Not enough. Their own resentment towards the things they have done is punishment enough. The fruit of their persistent good labor is the proof that they've made the right choice.

I think it can be hard to find the right thing to do and probably everyone of self-awareness in this age has made wrong decisions. If we were all punished by time or bodily harm for our wrong decisions, there would probably be a lot more people in jail for life or dead than there are living and free. Even the worst of the worst need forgiveness. Once they've turned around, who's to say they may not be the best of the best, or at least good? Even the least good helps. Don't kill chances for good or hide them away.